That field, called neuromarketing, is still in its infancy. Algorithmic accountability: One of the major problems with algorithmic decision-making systems is that as they grow in sophistication, they can become black boxes.
That could include everything we keep hidden in our inner sanctum, from sexual fantasies to political dissent. If you find it hard to imagine that a project incubated by Facebook could dramatically change norms around surveillance and law enforcement, just think for a minute about facial recognition technology.
Facebook rolled out that tech years ago in an innocent context: tagging your friends in photos you posted on the social-media network. But now the tech is used for policing and surveillance, disproportionately harming people of color. And other giants like Apple, Amazon, and Microsoft are all mired in controversy over it.
Existential alienation: Rubbing out the distinction between mind and machine also comes with more philosophical risks, like the risk that we might feel alienated from ourselves. The more you meld with a machine, the more you might grow confused about your own agency — where you end and the device begins. A recent article in Nature noted that the predictive nature of some BCI algorithms raises this concern:. Such algorithms learn from previous data and guide users towards decisions on the basis of what they have done in the past.
A BCI that reads and writes our thoughts could, if it becomes sophisticated enough, do something similar. Oversight: One big risk — so big, in fact, that it could be considered a meta-risk that inflects all the rest — is the lack of existing regulation in this space.
For now, tech giants can swoop into this legal vacuum with little or no oversight as to how they can gather, store, and monetize our brain data. What would an agency action even do? In fact, its stock shot up. Sign up for the Future Perfect newsletter. Our mission has never been more vital than it is in this moment: to empower through understanding. Financial contributions from our readers are a critical part of supporting our resource-intensive work and help us keep our journalism free for all.
Please consider making a contribution to Vox today to help us keep our work free for all. Cookie banner We use cookies and other tracking technologies to improve your browsing experience on our site, show personalized content and targeted ads, analyze site traffic, and understand where our audiences come from.
By choosing I Accept , you consent to our use of cookies and other tracking technologies. Facebook is building tech to read your mind. The ethical implications are staggering.
Reddit Pocket Flipboard Email. We often see the facial expressions and body language of someone and correctly guess that they are depressed, sick, happy, angry, or content. But what happens when someone has a good poker face? Can we still read minds without these visual clues to guide us? All you need is the drive to learn and the willingness to lean on your intuition when it tells you what someone is probably thinking or feeling at the moment. For some people this will be the skill that takes the most time to develop.
Perhaps you could take some yoga classes. Not only will they help you focus your mind and your energy, but they will also give you some quality flexibility and exercise. If you want to learn to read minds, you can follow some simple tips to get you started. These tips were developed by world-renowned psychic Kiran Behara. You should start by practicing these tips on your family and friends. You should notice quick results, but it will definitely take some time and practice to read the minds of total strangers.
In addition to clearing your mind of all thoughts and stresses, you must open up your energy to the people and possibilities around you. You just want to be present in the moment. Your mind and soul should soak up the energy given off by the people and things around you. Yoga is great at teaching us how to do this. But you can learn it on your own at home in the quietness of your room. Take a few moments to truly see the person sitting near you. Make a mental snapshot of their facial structure, their hair, their eyes, their posture, their body language, and other details.
Separate the person from the chair they are sitting in or the wall behind them. All of these things must be visualized in a specific way so that you can feel all the energy being produced around you. Look them directly in the eyes for about 15 seconds. After 15 seconds pass, you will want to look away. Psychopaths are often good at mind-reading , but bad at empathy.
This means they can manipulate others while remaining emotionally detached from their actions. Differentiating between mind-reading and empathy also helps us to understand conditions like autism, which are linked to social differences. People with autism often have major difficulties with mind-reading and more minor difficulties in empathising with people.
Having slightly lower empathy is not always a bad thing , potentially helping people to make more logical rather than emotional decisions. On the other hand, poor mind-reading is linked to problems such as difficulty making friends and mental health issues.
Surprisingly, nobody has attempted to create a questionnaire on mind-reading until now. Using data from over 4, people in the UK and US, including autistic and non-autistic people, we found that just four questions should be used to measure mind-reading. This may sound simplistic, but by developing such a short test we could collect data from very large samples. Want to know how good your mind-reading ability is? You can complete the test here. We also used our data to perform advanced statistical analyses that have never been performed before on human mind-reading.
Our results showed that the test was reliable and that males and females, as well as autistic and non-autistic people, interpreted the questions in the same way.
0コメント